News  • 

A Comparison of Non Court Dispute Resolution

In: Latest News

Talking is almost always the best way to solve difficulties and find a way forward even in the most hopeless of situations where the situation seems unsolvable…Think about the endless ACAS talks for the train and other strikes!

The same applies to matrimonial and relationship situations, in many ways this is an even more emotional and complex path to navigate, and a situation where assistance to talk, will be really important. Emotions can run high and face-to-face communication can feel like the hardest thing to do when your relationship ends.

Silence or heated arguments are the norm. Therefore, to start a productive solution based conversation and concentrate on what matters most to you and your family, often requires help. This is when mediation and other external communication tools such as family therapy are productive and help you move forward.

Mediation

Mediation is a voluntary, collaborative process where a highly trained neutral third-party mediator facilitates discussions between disputing parties to enable them to reach a mutually acceptable compromise. The mediator does not have decision-making authority but plays a key role in guiding the conversation, identifying underlying issues, and suggesting potential solutions.

The requirements

  • Voluntary and Flexible: Both parties must agree to the process, and they have control over whether they reach a resolution.
  • Confidential: Discussions in mediation are private, providing a safe space for open communication without fear of information being used in future litigation.
  • Control over Outcome: The parties retain control over the outcome, as the mediator’s role is to assist in negotiation, not impose a decision.
  • Cost and Time-Effective: Mediation tends to be faster and less costly than arbitration or litigation due to its more informal nature.

In order to understand your priorities and assist you in choosing the best course of action, mediators listen to you. They will assist you in coming up with workable ideas that benefit both you and, if you are a parent, your children. The mediator and you will most likely meet for several sessions; three to five one- to two-hour sessions are typical. To get legal advice on what is best for you, you can speak with your own Solicitor whenever you choose. When an agreement is reached your lawyer will put in place a legally binding agreement after you are both satisfied with the choices you have made.

Where agreement is not possible

If agreement cannot be reached there are other options other than the lengthy and sometimes arbitrary court process where you can have some degree of control.

Arbitration

This essentially is a situation where the parties agree to use a retired judge or very senior lawyer to make a binding and enforceable decision outside the Court process. Since March 2012, it has been accessible for financial disputes, and since July 2016, it has been accessible for child-related matters. Both parties and any other ancillary parties sign a commitment to follow the arbitrator’s ruling prior to the arbitration beginning. You also agree that the judgment, commonly called an “award,” will be legally enforceable after it has been made and converted into a court order by consent.

How does it operate?

To be eligible to hear arbitration disputes, family law arbitrators must complete training and fulfil certain requirements. They are all members of the Institute of Family Law Arbitrators, a rigorously regulated professional organization.

The arbitration procedure is customised to meet your needs. On the recommendation of your lawyers, you decide.

The neutral arbitrator acts as a judge, he or she reviews the written evidence and hears oral evidence presented by both parties and makes a binding decision. This process is more formal than mediation and akin to the court process. There is however more flexibility as you can choose your arbitrator and the much more speedy than the court process. would require the parties to be legally represented throughout the process and commit to adherence to the established procedural rules. Arbitration is commonly used in complex financial disputes where a conclusive decision is needed.

Key Features of FDR Arbitration:

  • Binding Decision: The decision made by the arbitrator is legally binding and enforceable, like a court judgment.
  • Structured and Formal: Arbitration follows a structured process, with hearings, evidence submission, and legal arguments.
  • Expertise in Financial Disputes: Arbitrators are often experts in financial matters, which can be crucial for resolving complex financial issues.
  • Limited Control: Unlike mediation, the parties have little control over the outcome, as the arbitrator ultimately decides the case.

Costs:

If you are to use a very senior arbitrator / PFDR Judge, the cost will be a lot more but at a senior level the cost will be in the region of £3,000 to 5,000 plus VAT for FDR. For arbitration, it will be in the region of £10,000 to £20,000 plus VAT.

Conclusion

The choice between Mediation and Arbitration largely depends on the nature of the dispute and the preferences of the parties involved. Mediation is ideal for parties seeking a flexible, cost-effective, and collaborative resolution. Arbitration, on the other hand, is better suited for those who require a binding decision, especially in complex financial disputes where legal expertise is essential. Both methods offer a way to avoid lengthy and costly litigation, but they cater to different needs and priorities in dispute resolution.

This article was written by Ann Thompson & Elena Panayi of Goodman Ray

Solicitor Ann Thompson