Re B [2015] EWCA Civ 886: Court of Appeal decision on habitual residence and inherent jurisdiction - Goodman Ray
×

Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Supporting our clients through challenging times

We wanted to reassure you that we are taking all the required precautions and necessary reasonable steps to maintain our usual level of service.

The well-being of our people, clients and the wider community is paramount to us whilst we continue to focus on our clients and their needs.

Our IT infrastructure allows our staff to work effectively and efficiently from home when needed so that we remain operational and our service seamless.

Please continue to contact us by telephone or email.

Tel: 020 7608 1227 & Email: mail@goodmanray.com

If you would prefer a face to face discussion, we are able to arrange meetings by video.
We have access to a range of video conferencing options, including Skype, Zoom and Facetime.

We are following government advice to minimise social contact, and that includes avoiding all but essential meetings.

During this time service will only be accepted by email.

Coronavirus (COVID-19): Supporting our clients through challenging times. Find out more, click here.

Jemma Dally has successfully represented a Respondent mother in the Court of Appeal.

The appeal was brought by the Respondent’s ex-partner who had applied for contact and the return of the child from Pakistan.  The child was conceived by IVF, her father is an unknown donor.

The case turned on two questions:

  1. Had the child lost her habitual residence in England when she left for Pakistan?
  2. Was the High Court’s decision to refuse to exercise the court’s inherent jurisdiction was the correct one?

The Court of Appeal determined that:

“…she [the Judge] applied the proper principles to the relevant facts and there is no reason to interfere with her finding that P lost her habitual residence here when she left for Pakistan.”

In respect of the question of inherent jurisdiction:

“The situation falls short of the exceptional gravity where it might indeed be necessary to consider the exercise of the inherent jurisdiction.”

The judgment is an important one for practitioners working in the field of international family law.

Read the judgment here.

CategoryGeneral News


© 2020 Goodman Ray | Legal & Terms | Goodman Ray Privacy Policy | Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority: 60514