Ciccone v Ritchie; Hague Proceedings / international law / private law - Goodman Ray
×

Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Supporting our clients through challenging times

We wanted to reassure you that we are taking all the required precautions and necessary reasonable steps to maintain our usual level of service.

The well-being of our people, clients and the wider community is paramount to us whilst we continue to focus on our clients and their needs.

Our IT infrastructure allows our staff to work effectively and efficiently from home when needed so that we remain operational and our service seamless.

Please continue to contact us by telephone or email.

Tel: 020 7608 1227 & Email: mail@goodmanray.com

If you would prefer a face to face discussion, we are able to arrange meetings by video.
We have access to a range of video conferencing options, including Skype, Zoom and Facetime.

We are following government advice to minimise social contact, and that includes avoiding all but essential meetings.

During this time service will only be accepted by email.

Coronavirus (COVID-19): Supporting our clients through challenging times. Find out more, click here.

Peggy Ray and Janet Broadley represented Rocco Ritchie in the recent proceedings involving him being heard at the High Court.

Two judgments were handed down in this case; the first being Madonna’s application under the 1980 Hague Convention for the summary return of Rocco, now 15 years old, to the USA. The first judgment reviewed the principles to be applied when considering whether to make a child a party to proceedings under the Convention.

The second judgment considered whether Madonna could withdraw her application. The issues for the court to determine were:

i. whether permission is required to withdraw an application under the 1980 Hague Convention and, if so, the test for permission

ii. if such an application is withdrawn, to what extent is the court able to give procedural directions in respect of any potential future applications

iii. what arrangements should be made in respect of the child’s passport at the conclusion of proceedings, and

iv. whether the judgment (and a previous judgment) should be reported and, if so, in what form.

The application to withdraw was granted.

Click on the following to read more: http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed159892

Click on the following to read more: http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed159893



© 2020 Goodman Ray | Legal & Terms | Goodman Ray Privacy Policy | Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority: 60514