Latest News:

Our offices will be closed between 24th December & 2nd January Inclusive.

CALL US:

Out of hours:

The President of the Family Division has called for the process of obtaining a divorce to be completely separate from a couple’s disputes over money. The proposal is aimed at reducing administrative pressure within the family courts by de-linking “the largely administrative and bureaucratic” divorce work from the more complex legal battles about who takes which assets from a marriage.

Generally, contested divorces are rare. The main area of contention between divorcing spouses tends to be agreeing a financial settlement. Most of the judges’ time is taken up with the subsidiary issues of what is known as a financial remedy application rather than the divorce itself.

“Has the time not come to bring about a complete de-linking – separation – of divorce and ‘money’,” Munby asked, “so that they are started and pursued by completely separate processes, albeit, of course, that the timeline for ancillary relief is determined by the progress of the divorce? My view, which I have been propounding for some time, is an unequivocal and emphatic yes!”

The President says that: “The need for continuing reform is clear, not least to create systems and procedures that can be easily navigated by the litigants in person who increasingly dominate the worlds of both divorce and money.” He proposes that specialist ‘Financial Remedies Courts’ be set up to deal with financial remedy claims, and that the first pilot court be rolled out as soon as sensibly possible in late 2017, or very early 2018.

Divorce is now dealt with in eleven regional divorce centres, while financial claims are still being dealt with by local courts. This means that when a financial remedies claim is made the divorce proceedings are transferred to the local court. It does make sense for financial claims to be dealt with separately. However, financial orders cannot usually be made until the decree nisi has been pronounced, and do not usually take effect until the divorce is finalised, and so, as the President pointed out, the local court will need to know what stage the divorce has reached.

Sir James Munby’s calls will be met with little resistance amongst family lawyers. It remains to be seen what the next government will do to alter “the lamentable history of procrastination” over divorce law reform.

Laura Dand (Associate)

Kawsar Ahmed

Are you looking for a leading Family Law Firm to represent you?

Get in touch with our team for expert legal advice and assistance you can trust.
Give us a call or request a call back.

Related Posts

The most wonderful time of the year can also be the most trying for newly divorced or separated families. Here,...
Goodman Ray is an award winning Family Law firm situated in central London. We have a vacancy for a full...
Goodman Ray is supporting Resolution’s Good Divorce Week (28 Nov – 2 Dec), which is highlighting why the Government must...
We are very excited to announce the opening of our new office in Brighton, 9 Pavilion Parade, Brighton BN2 1RA....
Goodman Ray are looking for an enthusiastic individual, who thrives in a busy working environment. This is a full time...
Goodman Ray moved into 9 Gough Square in January 2022. It was then known as Boswell House but after undertaking...