A Local Authority v The Mother & Anor [2017] EWFC B59 – A case highlighting the importance and benefit of securing early therapeutic input within care proceedings - Goodman Ray
×

Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Supporting our clients through challenging times

We wanted to reassure you that we are taking all the required precautions and necessary reasonable steps to maintain our usual level of service.

The well-being of our people, clients and the wider community is paramount to us whilst we continue to focus on our clients and their needs.

Our IT infrastructure allows our staff to work effectively and efficiently from home when needed so that we remain operational and our service seamless.

Please continue to contact us by telephone or email.

Tel: 020 7608 1227 & Email: mail@goodmanray.com

If you would prefer a face to face discussion, we are able to arrange meetings by video.
We have access to a range of video conferencing options, including Skype, Zoom and Facetime.

We are following government advice to minimise social contact, and that includes avoiding all but essential meetings.

During this time service will only be accepted by email.

Coronavirus (COVID-19): Supporting our clients through challenging times. Find out more, click here.

In this recent judgment, His Honour Judge Wildblood QC (HHJ Wildblood QC) expresses the importance of parents receiving necessary therapy at an early stage in care proceedings. The Court highlighted the common situation where an expert reporting within proceedings has recommended that a parent engage with therapy, but that owing to delays in securing therapeutic provision, this work has not been able to take place within the necessary timescales for the child.

This case involved the making of care and placement orders in respect of a five-month of child. The mother, who was in her mid twenties, had learning difficulties and had been severely abused during her childhood by experiencing emotional abuse, sexual abuse and neglect. Her older son had been made subject to care and placement orders just four months before the final hearing concerning this child.

Despite previous care proceedings and ongoing local authority involvement, the option of therapeutic input was never offered to the mother to try to enable her to overcome her long standing difficulties.

The Judge therefore had the difficult decision of whether:

– The child returned to live with her mother;
– The case was adjourned to assess the mother and the child further; or
– To make the care and placement orders sought by the Local Authority.

Unfortunately the Judge found that the only way that the child’s paramount interests could be met was through care and placement orders.

What is important to note is that HHJ Wildblood QC raised the concern that this is “yet another case of a young mother with a background in which she has experienced extreme abuse and deprivation whom has not been offered therapeutic support. It may well have been discussed with her in the past but has never been followed through to the point of offer of therapy” and that “this case is another example of how important it is that, if therapy is needed, it is obtained at an early stage”.

This case is therefore significant in bringing attention to providing the support that is needed for vulnerable parents, which could avoid families breaking down and children being placed in care and ultimately for adoption.



© 2020 Goodman Ray | Legal & Terms | Goodman Ray Privacy Policy | Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority: 60514